Success stories with BolsterBiz

How a fintech platform went from zero test coverage to 687 automated tests

No fintech company wants to find out about a bug from an irate user. In this QA outsourcing case study, you will explore how BolsterBiz built a Quality Engineering function from the ground up, embedding a dedicated QE team directly inside the client's agile squads. Here's a quick look at what changed at this client, and how.

0 → 687automated tests built
11,000+weekly automated test runs
10–14 → <3production defects per year
70%+reduction in production issues
The story

Good product. No safety net underneath it.

That's what this fintech platform was risking before partnering with BolsterBiz. The client is a fast-growing, US-based financial wellness company offering interest-free access to earned wages through a data-for-value model. Good product. But it had been live for nearly two years without a QA team, test automation, or documentation. Every release carried the risk that a defect would reach real users.

BolsterBiz built a Quality Engineering function from the ground up, embedding a dedicated QE team directly inside the client's agile squads.

IndustryFinancial technology (fintech)
Company sizeFast-growing, large active user base
HeadquartersUnited States
What they doInterest-free access to earned wages through a data-for-value model, plus budgeting and financial wellness tools
The challenges

What the client was dealing with

Before BolsterBiz, the client's release process just wasn't built to catch problems before users did.

Two years of quality debt

No QA team, no test automation, and no documentation — just a live product accumulating risk with every release.

Defects were reaching production

Weak testing let 10–14 defects slip through each year, along with 5–10 hotfixes and rollbacks that disrupted the user experience.

No shared system

There were no structured test scenarios and no traceability back to product stories, so quality relied on individual knowledge instead of a repeatable process.

Releases felt risky

With no safety net in place, every deploy carried the chance of an undetected defect reaching real users.

The solution

How BolsterBiz helped with quality engineering

We started by studying the architecture, defect history, and existing user stories to identify the real risk.

Then we went risk-first: automating a high-risk, end-to-end user journey as a proof of concept before scaling further. We built automated smoke tests into the GitLab CI/CD pipeline, so every commit triggered a quality check, and then expanded to full regression coverage across the web, mobile, API, and database layers.

Production defects and hotfixes dropped sharply. That built enough trust to position the QE team as a long-term quality partner across all the client's agile squads.

What changed

  • Automated tests went from 0 to 687, covering web, mobile, API, and database layers.
  • Weekly automated test runs passed 11,000, running nightly to catch issues early.
  • Production defects dropped from 10–14 a year to fewer than 3.
  • Hotfixes and rollbacks dropped from 5–10 a year to fewer than 3.
  • Reduced operations costs through improved release predictability.
Case study preview

Take a look inside

This case study walks through exactly how the QE team was built, the tools used, and how coverage scaled sprint by sprint.

Unlock the full case study
How a fintech platform scaled to 11,000+ weekly tests and faster releases
1 / 3
Client background: fast-growing US-based fintech offering interest-free access to earned wages
2 / 3

The full breakdown inside

The team structure, tooling, and month-by-month rollout — free to download.

3 / 3
Free download

Want to read the full story?

This is just the highlight reel. The full case study walks through:

  • How the dedicated QE team was structured and embedded in agile squads
  • What tools were used (Selenium, Appium, TestNG, BrowserStack, GitLab CI/CD)
  • How full regression coverage across web, mobile, API, and database was achieved

Download the Full Case Study

No spam — just the PDF and an optional follow-up.

Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email

Something went wrong sending your details. Please try again.

You're all set

Thanks! Your case study is on its way.

Open the case study